LABOURSTART WARNING

 

OPEN LETTER: Against Labour Start's veto of Palestinian Worker News

A group of concerned labour and social movement activists from different countries have initiated this petition, against the shutdown of Palestinian worker news on the major labour news website, Labour Start. (www.labourstart.org)
An Open Letter to LabourStart
The international trade union news website LabourStart systematically under-reports Palestinian labour news. Until very recently, the website unbelievably carried a link to the "Israeli Defense Forces" - the military wing of the State of Israel. This was only removed after a group of activists initiated a complaint.
LabourStart is a site that has marketed itself to trade unions all over the world, whose media officers and activists spend time gathering news from their countries to upload to LabourStart. They do this on the basis that LabourStart is the place "where trade unionists start their days on the web" - on the basis that LabourStart is supposed to be the main international source of labour news, and an important tool for international worker solidarity.
The open letter below calls on trade unionists to ask LabourStart to clarify, and in the absence of a credible explanation, to review their relationship with LabourStart.
The current news from Palestine on LabourStart amounts to FIVE items for November 2004, and four of these are condolences from trade union federations to the Palestinians about Yasser Arafat's death.
So although the Palestinian workers have been exposed to higher levels of exploitation than other workers in the world this month, they are only worthy of ONE story out of 41. Israeli workers get 22 stories this month.
This has been a consistent pattern at Labour Start. In September, they carried THREE articles about Palestinian workers and 148 about Israeli worker issues. Furthermore, Labour Start refuses to publish articles sent to them about abuses of Palestinian workers by Israelis. For example, they rejected an article about Israeli soldiers forcing Palestinian workers to drink urine at a checkpoint.
Labour Start will only publish Palestinian worker news along the following lines:
·       A letter from the ICFTU to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan complaining of low wages and poor working conditions amongst UNRWA staff
·       A letter from the IFJ (International Federation of Journalists) headlined by LabourStart as "IFJ Calls on Palestinians and Arafat to Act over Kidnapping Terror of Journalists" (though the letter itself called on all sides in the Palestinian conflict, and made clear that the CNN journalist had been kidnapped by unknown assailants).
·       An article exposing the Mayor of Jericho's failure to abide by a Palestinian Authority decision supporting the rights of municipal employees to organise in the union of their choice.
However valid each of these items may be, they omit the central fact confronting Palestinian workers in Gaza and the West Bank: life under military Occupation.
When it comes to Israel, however, LabourStart has 148 articles for September 2004 alone.
The imbalance between Palestinian and Israeli labour coverage - and the systematic omission of material on the Occupation (as it affects workers) - amounts to bias against Palestinian labour.
Some recent Palestinian labour stories, none of which appeared on LabourStart, are reproduced in the Background to this letter.
Except for occasional, and valuable, material from the Workers Advice Centre, LabourStart readers rarely hear from Palestinians. But they do hear from Editor Eric Lee. His autobiographical notes page
http://www.labourstart.org/ericlee/
included a link to the IDF website until about two weeks ago, when it was removed after the Wits University Palestine Solidarity Committee sent him a letter of complaint.
Why should a trade union news site carry a link to an army, let alone an army rampaging through territory occupied in defiance of the UN?
Indeed, trade unionists might be a lot more interested in material from Refusniks like Haggai Matar, who told a military court last December "We say a truth that most of the public does not know, and that many choose not to know, and that's why we are being punished. They do war crimes and they expect us to keep silent. But we will not be silent. We will speak out against the occupation, even when we pay a price."
Those old enough to remember the 1980s should recall how another generation of trade unionists responded to another apartheid society - by sanctions against the regime and direct solidarity with workers under its heel.
We ask you to
1) write to LabourStart asking them to clarify their criteria for including or excluding Palestinian labour news. Write to ericlee@labourstart.org
2) ask them to explain why a link to the IDF website is appropriate.
3) let us know what they say
4) Depending on the replies, you may wish to reconsider your organisation's relationship with LabourStart.
Signed so far:
·       Roland Rance - Chair, Amicus -- Central London (0692); Secretary, Waltham Forest Trades Council
·       PatchA, Korean Progressive Network 'Jinbonet'
·       Tony Greenstein, Secretary, Brighton & Hove TUC Unemployed Workers Centre, UK
·       Sue Blackwell, Association of University Teachers, UK
·       Moshe' Machover, Israeli Socialist
·       Els Hendricks, X Minus Y Solidarity Fund, Netherlands
·       Frances Kelly, UNISON steward (personal capacity); anti-apartheid activist 1971-94
·       Dr Costa Gazi, NEC Member, Pan Africanist Congress of Azania
·       Dr Patrick Bond, Director, Centre for Civil Society, South Africa
·       Dorothy Naor, New Profile anti-militarism group, Israel
·       Farid Taamallah, Palestinian Activist
·       Anti-Privatisation Forum, South Africa
·       Dave Parks, Exeter Socialists, England
·       Riaz Tayob, South African activist
·       Walton Pantland, South African union activist
·       Na'eem Jeenah - President, Muslim Youth Movement of South Africa and spokesperson, Palestine Solidarity Committee - South Africa
·       Wits University Palestine Solidarity Committee, South Africa
·       Anna Weekes, South African labour and social movement activist
·       Greg Dropkin, UK activist
·       Jim Gladwin, New Zealand labour activist
·       Dr Jeff Rudin, Researcher at South African Municipal Workers Union
·       Woody Aroun, South African Trade Unionist from NUMSA
·       Kim Jurgensen, South African activist
·       Dr Dale T McKinley, South African labour and social movement activist
·       Anne Candlin, One World Centre,annecandlin@hotmail.com
·       Khwezi Gule, South African activist

Background to Open Letter to LabourStart

A) Missing news items

B) An apartheid society

C) Trade unionists and apartheid



A) Recent examples of Palestinian labour news not reported on LabourStart


1) Three Days Ultimatum for Palestinian Olive Growers to finish

George Rishmawi-IMEMC & Agencies, October 12, 2004

Israeli Authorities warned Palestinian olive growers in the Nablus area in the West Bank to finish picking the olives in three days, claiming that the olive picking season threatened lives of Israeli settlers.

This step comes one day after settlers from Yetzhar settlement assaulted some farmers in Asseirah Al-Qibliyyeh resulted in critically injuring one of the farmers in the neck.

An eyewitness reported that the farmer was shot by a soldier.

Justifying the three days ultimatum, the army claims that they can not provide protection for the farmers for more than three days. Some farmers spend a month picking their olives.

Over 30 villages will be affected by this decision. The new military regulations will prevent the farmers to enter their olive groves after the three days end.

Walid Jaber from Yanoun village southeast of Nablus, said that no Palestinian farmer will finish the picking even if we have hundreds of workers if these military orders are implemented.


2) Palestinian olive grower shot, critically wounded 

Jonathan Lis

Haaretz

October 11, 2004

A Palestinian farmer was shot and critically wounded in his olive orchard near Nablus in the West Bank on Monday. Palestinians blamed Israel Defense Forces, while the IDF said that a Jewish settler fired the shots. 

Hani Shadeh, 26, was shot in the neck by a soldier after the troops arrived at the orchard to break up a fist fight between Jewish settlers and the Palestinians picking olives, said Munir Darwish, a Palestinian who was picking with Shadeh.

The soldier knelt on his knees and took aim at Shadeh from about 300 meters away as the troops arrived on the scene, Darwish said. Three settlers who had scuffled with the Palestinians were later detained by soldiers, he said.

IDF officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, denied that troops were in the area at the time of the shooting, saying settlers had apparently fired the shot.

Shadeh was evacuated in critical condition to a local hospital.


The skirmish occurred near the village of Asira Al-Qibliyeh, south of the West Bank city of Nablus. The village is located near the settlement of Yitzhar. Local Palestinians say Jewish settlers cut down about 1,000 olive trees in the Nablus area during the harvest season last year as part of an effort to drive the Palestinians off their farmland.

As a result, in recent years during the harvest, farmers near sensitive areas such as Yitzhar have been accompanied by activists from international organizations as well as ?the olive harvest coalition,? which unites a number of left-wing Israeli organizations.


2) Inhuman Treatment of Checkpoints; soldiers force a Palestinian worker to drink their urine

Saed Bannoura-IMEMC & Agencies, September 17, 2004

http://www.imemc.org/headlines/2004/September/week3/091704/soldiers-morality.htm

The Israeli Newspaper Maariv, revealed on Wednesday that soldiers forced a Palestinian worker to choose between drinking their urine or breaking his leg or hand. The newspaper said that Sameeh, 24 years old, was held by soldiers on Abu Dis checkpoint, near Jerusalem, and was taken to a military post in a building controlled by the army called the "Inn".

Sameeh spoke about the inhuman treatment he was subjected to along with another worker and said that soldiers picked his identity card and the card of another worker then released the rest of the apprehended workers after barring them from entering Jerusalem.

Sameeh added that soldiers forced him and the other worker to do a poll, conducted by the soldiers "as a sort of entertainment!", the soldiers wrote on three pieces of paper the "punishment", first paper was to break a leg, second paper to break an arm, then the third to drink urine prepared by the soldiers previously in a bottle, which shows previous intentions to conduct this inhuman act.

The soldiers tried to force the second worker and Sameeh to choose a paper and do what it says, but when Sameeh refused, one of the soldiers hit him on his hand and brought a bottle filled with urine and poured it on his head after splashing the urine at his face.

Whenever Sameeh tried to defend himself or even ask the soldiers why they are doing this to him, he was clubbed again, and again, and told them that he will not do what they want even if they kill him, yet the soldiers attacked him again and tried to force him to drink the urine.

Sameeh, in an act of self defense pushed the soldier away, and then six other soldiers attacked him and pointed their M16 automatic rifle at his head, clubbed him and forced him to drink urine from the bottle until he passed out.

Sameeh was transferred to a clinic in Abu Dis, and received first aid and medication to clean his stomach, then he was transferred to Beit Jala Governmental Hospital were he received treatment until he was released on Monday September 13th, 2004, some days after the incident.

The medical report revealed that Sameeh was in a hysterical condition when he arrived to the hospital, and couldn't control any part of his body. Meanwhile, Sameeh said that the other worker was severely clubbed and that he does not know what happened to him.

Sameeh said that he is thinking of pressing charges against the soldiers but at the same time he is scared of revenge acts or being charged with false accusations as soldiers in the field always do. Several cases of assaults and inhuman treatment were reported on checkpoints, soldiers on checkpoints, as it seems, have their own rules and regulations, and apparently morals. The mood of soldiers on checkpoints could easily decide who lives or dies which ambulances is to pass and which is not allowed. Repeatedly, soldiers assaulted and abused the residents on checkpoints, in many cases forced them to strip under claims of searches and "security procedures".

Men, women and children have to cross the hundreds of checkpoints spread all over the Palestinian territories blocking them from each other; those people have to go through the daily humiliations in their way to their schools or works and even on their way to hospitals and medical centers.

--------

3) Beit - Hanoun Under Siege and Fire

Report by Dr. Mona El - Farra, Union of Health Work Committees - Gaza

Published: 13/07/04

www.labournet.net/world/0407/beithan1.html

On the 30th of June, Israeli occupying forces launched an ongoing incursion into Beit - Hanoun village, on the pretext of creating a security zone and to prohibit the launch of attacks against Israeli settlements. Beit - Hanoun is a village of 35, 000 people in the northern Gaza
Strip, on the borders with historic Palestine.

Friends, Help us to spread the word and show your practical support for Palestinians under occupation. As a result of the first 24 hour incursion which demolished roads, drinking water pumps were destroyed and drinking water was mixed with sewage from broken pipes. This led to an outbreak of gastroenteritis in hundreds of children.



1) The four entrances to the village are completely closed, not one person is allowed in or out of the village except with time consuming and difficult permission from the Israeli occupation forces.

2) 4 homes are completely occupied with their residents trapped in one room, forced to ask soldiers for permission if they even need to go to the bathroom.

3) Only some renal dialysis and cancer patients managed to get exit permission to receive their treatment at another local hospital and through complicated and time consuming procedures.

4) The Ministry of Health measles vaccination program was largely disrupted, and the teams were not allowed to continue the vaccination scheme. With the help of UNICEF this problem was eventually solved after three days wait. But we do not know if all children in the village were vaccinated, as people are afraid to leave their homes.

5) 35, 000 people are under fire. On the 9th of June three women were seriously injured while trying to reach the village health center, they were trying to cross the road carrying a white flag as a sign of peace and to indicate that they are civilians and in need of help. The
soldiers opened fire without any warning, a mother and her 2 daughters were seriously injured.

Furthermore:

1. No food or medicine and medical supplies are allowed into Beit - Hanoun, food is now in great shortage, as only one truck was allowed to enter in 13 days.

2. People are afraid to move freely inside the village, resulting in decreasing numbers of patients who seek treatment in our medical center inside Beit - Hanoun people seek emergency medical help only.

3. Pregnant women who need to attend hospital for delivery are unable to reach Al Awda Hospital, only 5 minutes away from the village, we can expect the impact of that on high risk pregnancies.

4. Union of Health Work Committees ambulances are not allowed to enter Beit - Hanoun, no patients are allowed for referral to Al Awda hospital.

5. The village is under complete control from outside and there are daily incursions into the village.

The Union of Heath Work Committees appeals to you to spread the word, the whole Gaza Strip is in great shock. What is happening in Beit - Hanoun is a humanitarian catastrophe, its
implications on the entire population will show themselves now and for years to come, and it is also a collective punishment, banned under international law.

Yours in solidarity,
Dr. Mona El - Farra Union of Health Work Committees - Gaza



5) Palestinians rally at the walls of Jerusalem on Labour Day 

Johannes Wahlstrom, May 1, 2004 16:34

As unemployment among Palestinians skyrockets with the construction of the West Bank wall, workers rally for demonstration at Abu Dis. An old saying fitting today's rally has it that the one thing worse than being exploited, is not being exploited. As unemployment soars over 50 % on the West Bank, and "illegal" workers have a tougher time getting in to Israeli territories, Palestinians marked the 1st of May by demonstrating for the right to work.

A handful of Israeli communists and peace activists also joined the rally, which together with a demonstration in Nazareth was the only one Israelis could hope for today. Meanwhile foreign aid workers are expressing their concerns, and talking of a potential catastrophe in regard to
what will happen in a few months when the wall around Jerusalem is completed.

We, Palestinian and Israeli workers should unite against our common capitalist enemy, said Ahmed, a young man from Abu Dis. Together we should tear down the wall and build a better place, because none of us have anything to win on this conflict he proceeded.

To fill the gap in the labour force, when Palestinians are no longer allowed in Israel, the Israeli government imported some 700,000 foreign guest workers. As unemployment in Israel now also reaches unbearable proportions, with estimates of far over 10%, the situation becomes all the more unbearable for both peoples. By the looks of the low Israeli turnout on the Labour Day rallies, it is however yet far from evident that the workers of Israel and Palestine will unite.

http://www.imemc.org/headlines/2004/May/week1/050104/labor-day.htm


B) An apartheid society

Israel systematically discriminates against non-Jews, occupies territory in defiance of the UN, invades neighbouring countries, and is the only state in the Middle East with nuclear weapons.

It is no coincidence that Israel was one of apartheid South Africa's staunchest allies, or that what Israel now calls a "security barrier" or "separation fence" under construction in the West Bank is known to the rest of the world by another name.

Apartheid Wall

Here, for example, are the basic facts on Qalqilya from PENGON:

Qalqiliya is the first of Palestinian towns to be hermetically sealed by Israel's Apartheid Wall, which coils around the city three kilometers. The Wall, concrete reinforcement 8 meters (25 feet) high, has encaged the city and brought devastating effects to residents.



. There are approximately 41, 600 residents in Qalqiliya.

. City Area: 3, 500 dunums (875 acres) of residential and 6, 500 (1, 625 acres) dunums of agricultural lands.

. The Wall has confiscated and isolated 3, 750 (937. 5 acres) dunums of land while destroying another 2, 200 (550 acres) for its footprint.

. Qalqiliya has been completely encircled by the Wall with one military checkpoint being the sole entrance/exit for the city.

. Almost half of the West Bank's freshwater resources come from the Western Aquifer which rests under Qalqiliya; Qalqiliya will lose at least 13 groundwater wells to the Wall.

. Prior to the Intifada', Qalqiliya was the market center for over 85, 000 Palestinians from the West Bank and Israel per week. The Wall and continual closure have caused the market to almost completely shut down; most merchants have relocated to nearby villages.

. Closure has caused 6, 000 residents from the city and 13, 000 residents from the district to lose employment in Israel.

The Wall is not the only apartheid feature of Israeli society.

Lupolianski wants Arab Wadi Joz re-zoned for Jews

By Nadav Shragai, Haaretz Correspondent 24/09/2004
http://www. haaretzdaily. com/hasen/spages/481362. html

Jerusalem Mayor Uri Lupolianski wants to re-zone a neighborhood of Wadi Joz, in the eastern section of the capital, for the purpose of settling Jews in the area. The neighborhood in question was zoned and planned a number of years ago by the Housing Ministry for Arab residents.

In a letter sent recently to the Housing Ministry, Lupolianski wrote that "zoning the neighborhood for a Jewish population is likely to contribute significantly to the unification of the city."

Commenting on Lupolianski's request, the chairman of the Yahad branch in Jerusalem, Ehud Arnon, said that the mayor, who always spoke nobly of equality for the Arab population in the capital, was now revealing himself to be no different from his predecessor.

Legal Framework

Discrimination is built into the legal framework of Israel as a "Jewish State", most notably through the Law of Return, adopted in 1950, which begins "Every Jew has the right to come to this country as an oleh" (a Jew immigrating to Israel). Palestinians displaced by the ethnic
cleansing of 1948 have no such right. The Citizenship law of 1952 spells out that Israeli citizenship may be acquired by one of four ways: birth, return, residence or naturalisation. All Jews, wherever they are born, acquire citizenship through return. Non-Jews born in Israel, however, do not necessarily acquire citizenship by birth. Only those whose parents
are Israeli citizens automatically become citizens by and at birth; others must apply for it and meet various criteria. On their birth certificates, their citizenship status is left blank. Palestinians resident in the areas which became part of the state of Israel in 1948 could apply
for citizenship by residence provided that they had been at all times since 15 May 1948 in areas under the control of Israeli forces. Since Israel siezed after May 1948 large, populated areas allocated by the UN to a Palestinian state, there were very many Palestinians resident in Israel who did not qualify for citizenship. They were defined as absentees, and their property was administered by the state-appointed Custodian of Absentee property. They were, however, present in the state, and thus the bizarre legal category of "present absentees" was established. Although some of them acquired citizenship following a 1980 amendment to the law, they remained defined as absentees.

Breaking Ranks

Just as key information about the South African Defence Force came from the End Conscription Campaign - whites who refused to fight for apartheid - the inside story of the IDF is being told today by the "refusniks": Israelis who refuse to serve in the Occupied Territories or even to choose imprisonment in preference to any form of military service.

Here, for example, are excerpts (forwarded by the Israeli Peace Bloc Gush Shalom) from statements in military court by young refusniks as they were sentenced last December:

"We are being punished for saying the word o-c-c-u-p-a-t-i-o-n. So here I say it again: occupation, occupation, occupation" said Matan Kaminer. "The most easy thing for an 18-year old in this country is to get an exemption from the army through all kind of backhand tricks. Anybody can do it, and many do. We chose to go the hard way. We say that the occupation is a moral abomination which moral people can not tolerate and that this is the reason that we refuse to enlist. If our sincerity means that we will sit many years in prison then we will sit many years in prison. "

"We say a truth that most of the public does not know, and that many choose not to know, and that's why we are being punished" said Haggai Matar. "They do war crimes and they expect us to keep silent. But we will not be silent. We will speak out against the occupation, even when we pay a price. "

"The worse the occupation becomes, the more people will refuse. " These words of Adam Maor were to go into the evening TV news of Channel-I. "A country which oppresses three and half million people and denies them the most basic human rights is a country which is bound also to oppress its own citizens. No wonder that this country is sending us to prison.
No wonder that it is trampling the poor and the disadvantaged, as it does. "

Shimri Tzameret was next: "I am not deterred by this verdict. This court is part of the army, and the army is doing terrible and immoral things such as sending my friends to risk their life for Netzarim settlement [an isolated Jewish settlement inside the Gaza Strip] and for [the
Jewish settlers inside] Hebron, when everybody knows that eventually we will evacuate these places. The army is causing despair in the Palestinian society. In fact it is the army which is breeding the suicide bombers. This is the kind of army it is, and it is no surprise that this is the verdict handed by the court of this army. "





C) Trade Unionists and Apartheid

Remember 1979, when Margaret Thatcher became Britain's Prime Minister, soon to be followed by Ronald Reagan as US President? Internationally, Britain and the US lined up in support of apartheid South Africa to protect their investments, secure strategic mineral resources, and pursue their world-wide anti-communist crusade.

The Soweto uprising and the murder of Black Consciousness leader Steve Biko in 1976 had already made apartheid a focus of international condemnation, which strengthened as black South African workers appealed for solidarity. By 1980 the UK and US governments had made clear choices and such solidarity could only come through independent action. A
movement for sanctions - from mass consumer boycotts to disinvestment campaigns to industrial action. grew rapidly.

Meanwhile, workers in Britain had begun to confront the reality of global production - a wave of factory closures, mass unemployment and the anti-union laws. The growing realisation that there were no simple local solutions led some activists to look towards international organisation.

The fight against apartheid and for working class internationalism came together as the independent trade union movement emerged in South Africa, eventually leading to the formation of COSATU in 1985. Supporters did what they could to publicise industrial news from inside the apartheid regime to those UK and US unions and shop stewards committees
operating within the very same transnationals.

Now imagine a publication, "LabourNews", which might have been launched in 1979. Dedicated to informing trade unionists on issues of globalisation, LabourNews reproduced press reports faxed from correspondents in the Philippines, Korea, Mexico, as well as Europe and North America. For some reason the glossy magazine barely mentioned the emerging workers movement in South Africa. But it did feature autobiographical material from the Editor, a world expert on trade union communication networks. And then one week when South Africa re-invaded Mozambique, sent dogs and teargas to crush another strike, or tested a nuclear weapon in the South Atlantic, the Editor's personal page ran an advert for the South
African Defence Force journal.


How would you have reacted?

[ends]

Back to www.amicus.cc