|
The head of the country's biggest manufacturing union has
signalled his determination to claw back the ground lost by the
trade union movement in the boardrooms of Britain and the corridors
of power.
Derek Simpson, who begins work this week as the joint general
secretary of Amicus, attacked the "exuberance" of ministers in
"slapping down" unions.
He also set out his opposition to "sweetheart deals" between
unions and companies, arguing that "competing to provide a worse
agreement for our members should give way to a competition of who
could provide the best".
Mr Simpson, who has been portrayed as an old-style leftwinger,
made clear that he was no Marxist class warrior looking for
battle.
"People don't say 'let's have a strike, let's have a week off',"
he said. "They go on strike when, despite all the best attempts of
themselves and the professional advisers, the trade unions are
unable to reach amicable agreement."
He said he was determined to map out a role as a constructive
critic within the Labour party. "I think first of all I need to set
the record straight. People are trying to suggest that I'm attacking
Labour or attacking New Labour. This is not the case."
The Amicus general secretary, who presides over the union in
partnership with Roger Lyons, was not exactly fulsome in his praise
of the Labour leadership.
Asked who should succeed Tony Blair as prime minister he replied:
"It's a bit like asking which horse do you think will win the Derby,
but we are not really looking at Derby-class horses here when you
look at the potential candidates."
Rather ominously for Mr Blair, one of Britain's most powerful
trade union figures offered a little more praise for Gordon Brown,
his rival. "I get the impression that there's a more realistic and
reasoned approach to trade unions, without the rhetoric, from Gordon
Brown than perhaps from Tony Blair. Blair speaks perhaps in a more
fraternal way, but do you believe the person who's putting on the
face as much as another person who's talking more clearly?"
Mr Simpson noted warily: "I get the impression that unions are
all right if they don't want to open their mouth and say
anything."
He grudgingly welcomed the 1999 Employment Relations Act, which
introduced compulsory union recognition if a certain number of
workers supported it.
But he complained: "It's like drawing teeth. It comes diluted and
as late as we can, like the rest of the legislation I complain
about."
Mr Simpson acknowledged, however, that compulsory union
recognition had increased the power of unions by leaving them less
reliant on trying to gain voluntary recognition from companies
through sweetheart deals that betray the interests of members.
He repeated his promise to "rip up" existing deals if members
vote against them, estimating there were "probably about 10 of those
that are questioned quite frequently that one would expect would be
scrutinised". Mr Simpson hinted that some involved Japanese car
companies - a comment that will worry Nissan and Toyota, with whom
Amicus has agreements. |